From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Marco Colombo <pgsql(at)esiway(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Maximum transaction rate |
Date: | 2009-03-15 01:28:39 |
Message-ID: | 1237080519.29462.0.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sun, 2009-03-15 at 01:48 +0100, Marco Colombo wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 05:25 +0100, Marco Colombo wrote:
> >> Scott Marlowe wrote:
> >
> >> Also see:
> >> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/26/41
> >> but it seems to me that all this discussion is under the assuption that
> >> disks have write-back caches.
> >> "The alternative is to disable the disk write cache." says it all.
> >
> > If this applies to raid based cache as well then performance is going to
> > completely tank. For users of Linux + PostgreSQL using LVM.
> >
> > Joshua D. Drake
>
> Yet that's not the point. The point is safety. I may have a lightly loaded
> database, with low write rate, but still I want it to be reliable. I just
> want to know if disabling the caches makes it reliable or not.
I understand but disabling cache is not an option for anyone I know. So
I need to know the other :)
Joshua D. Drake
--
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake(at)jabber(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2009-03-15 01:36:51 | Re: ODBC limitation?? |
Previous Message | Dann Corbit | 2009-03-15 01:07:22 | Re: ODBC limitation?? |