| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params? |
| Date: | 2009-03-12 19:12:01 |
| Message-ID: | 1236885121.28644.241.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 08:26 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Tom,
>
> > Discuss the implications of changing such a GUC partway
> > through this sequence. For extra credit, explain what would happen if
> > it were set via ALTER ROLE SET for one role or the other.
> >
> > In short: -1 from me.
>
> Heh. That's your best rejection yet. Someday I'll print out all the
> rejection e-mails from you and wallpaper my office. ;-)
Josh, this isn't a rejection. Both Tom and I asked for more exploration
of the implications of doing as you suggest. Tom has been more helpful
than I was in providing some scenarios that would cause problems. It is
up to you to solve the problems, which is often possible.
I can't vouch for your taste in wallpaper, but this doesn't deserve a
place in your collection...
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Morgan | 2009-03-12 19:28:16 | Access to last date and time role was used to connect |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-03-12 15:28:58 | Re: View running statements |