Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1704)

From: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Joshua Brindle <method(at)manicmethod(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
Subject: Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1704)
Date: 2009-03-10 19:25:34
Message-ID: 1236713134.3444.32.camel@laptop-hp.gunduz.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 11:44 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> We would do the same thing with SE-Postgres.

No, no. I already experienced this with --integer-datetimes sets, and I
don't ever want to maintain another set. It is horrible.
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ, RHCE
devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stefan Moeding 2009-03-10 19:40:45 Re: Sampling Profler for Postgres
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-03-10 19:17:37 Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1704)