| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)endpoint(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d |
| Date: | 2009-03-10 08:21:09 |
| Message-ID: | 1236673269.31880.341.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 21:02 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
> >>
> >>> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> >>>> but maybe it's better to use -i and -I, and thus change them both?
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >>> That's already used:
> >>
> >>> -i, --ignore-version proceed even when server version mismatches
> >>> pg_dump version
> >>
> >> Proposal: drop the short forms of these two switches entirely.
> >> Anybody who actually needs the capability can write "--inserts".
> >
> > +1. I was just thinking the same thing.
>
> +1, that sounds like a very good idea.
+1 good plan
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-03-10 08:46:28 | Re: Prepping to break every past release... |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-03-10 08:17:41 | Re: Sampling Profler for Postgres |