Re: Better support for whole-row operations and composite types

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Better support for whole-row operations and composite types
Date: 2004-04-03 06:25:40
Message-ID: 12365.1080973540@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> ... The SRF API was for user defined functions, not
> procedural languages anyway. I'll look at how the other procedural
> languages handle tuple arguments.

It was a dozen-or-so-lines change in each of the PL languages AFAIR.
You will probably also want to look at what you do to return tuple
results.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2004-04-03 06:33:49 Re: Better support for whole-row operations and composite
Previous Message Joe Conway 2004-04-03 06:00:54 Re: Better support for whole-row operations and composite