From: | Ow Mun Heng <Ow(dot)Mun(dot)Heng(at)wdc(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Phoenix Kiula <phoenix(dot)kiula(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Adrian Klaver <aklaver(at)comcast(dot)net>, Ian Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>, PG-General Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Smartest way to resize a column? |
Date: | 2009-03-04 09:40:16 |
Message-ID: | 1236159616.3941.0.camel@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 14:42 +0800, Phoenix Kiula wrote:
> > ALTER COLUMN TYPE is intended for cases where actual transformation of
> > the data is involved. Obviously varchar(20) to varchar(35) doesn't
> > really require any per-row effort, but there's no operation in the
> > system that handles that case. But if you're brave, you can do it
> > via manipulation of the system catalogs. Observe:
>
> ...snip....
>
>
> Thanks Tom. Yes, no data change is required. But I don't think I have
> the understanding to try what you suggested. Running the alter table
> on my home database (almost same data) took an hour and it wasn't
> complete. I had even dropped the index. So I guess altering it that
> way is a pain in PGSQL. Bummer.
>
Actually, I did the same thing on a live database and it worked!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-03-04 10:04:56 | Re: Problem with Mauritius summer time (MUST) |
Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2009-03-04 09:19:49 | Re: Date/time of last commit |