Re: BUG #16036: Segmentation fault while doing an update

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Антон Власов <druidvav(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #16036: Segmentation fault while doing an update
Date: 2019-10-04 03:42:43
Message-ID: 12361.1570160563@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> Yea, I was wondering about that too - but asking for a slot to be copied
> into itself seems to indicate a logic bug more often than not? Expecting
> the slots to be independent, afterwards. So I'm a bit hesitant doing so.

Oh, good point. The Assert sounds better then.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2019-10-04 04:30:21 Re: BUG #16036: Segmentation fault while doing an update
Previous Message Andres Freund 2019-10-04 03:36:10 Re: BUG #16036: Segmentation fault while doing an update