Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, "K, Niranjan (NSN - IN/Bangalore)" <niranjan(dot)k(at)nsn(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches
Date: 2009-03-01 10:12:13
Message-ID: 1235902333.16176.731.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 23:21 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Fujii,
>
> >> Again, I'm not planning to get rid of any existing capabilities
> >
> > Good
> >
> >> unless necessary.
> >
> > That is not a caveat I will accept, a priori.
>
> While Simon stated it a bit strongly

My intention was only to be clear about how important a technical point
it was for me. My comments were aimed at avoiding a costly blind alley,
not critically towards any individual.

I am happy to apologise in case people thought my words rude.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Grzegorz Jaskiewicz 2009-03-01 11:22:44 Re: cardinality()
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2009-03-01 07:21:24 Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches