Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, "K, Niranjan (NSN - IN/Bangalore)" <niranjan(dot)k(at)nsn(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches
Date: 2009-02-24 18:51:58
Message-ID: 1235501518.9565.26.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 18:48 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 10:34 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> > Well VLDB is like 2% of what we need.
>
> I am against removing an existing capability that is important to some
> users. We shouldn't need to debate the exact percentage of users that
> would be affected, or how to count them.

See Heikki's comment.

Joshua D. Drake

>
> --
> Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
> PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
>
>
--
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake(at)jabber(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-02-24 18:53:23 Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2009-02-24 18:48:42 Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches