Re: FYI: Load times for a largish DB in 8.2 vs. 8.3 vs. 8.4

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
Cc: "Todd A(dot) Cook" <tcook(at)blackducksoftware(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FYI: Load times for a largish DB in 8.2 vs. 8.3 vs. 8.4
Date: 2009-06-19 18:17:49
Message-ID: 12351.1245435469@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> If you have time to repeat the experiments, it would be interesting to
>> see what happens with consistent default_statistics_target across 8.3
>> and 8.4.

> given that this was likely a single-thread restore and therefor wal
> logged I wonder if the 206min one might be affected by the issue
> discussed here
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-06/msg01133.php

It might be, but the current theory about that (ie that it's the
bulkwrite patch doing it) doesn't explain the interaction with
autovacuum on/off. I'd still like to hear whether changing the stats
target changes Todd's results.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ivan Sergio Borgonovo 2009-06-19 18:23:20 looping over a small record set over and over in a function
Previous Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2009-06-19 17:59:38 Re: FYI: Load times for a largish DB in 8.2 vs. 8.3 vs. 8.4