| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Martín Marqués <martin(dot)marques(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Mammoth replicator |
| Date: | 2009-02-18 17:36:32 |
| Message-ID: | 1234978592.1775.17.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 13:55 -0200, Martín Marqués wrote:
> I was working on a replication system (open source) for a DB we are
> using and I was going to go for Slony-I for replication and pg_pool2
> for load balancing.
>
> Just yeasterday I found out the Mammoth replicator was released as
> Open Source, and AFAICS it looks more suitable for our needs then
> Slony-I (we are going to replicate the whole DB). I'm I wrong on this?
Well that would depend on your needs I guess. Slony-I is a fine if
complicated system. I would suggest popping over the the
replicator-general list.
Joshua D. Drake
--
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake(at)jabber(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Roberts | 2009-02-18 17:42:05 | Re: Two-phase commmit, plpgsql and plproxy |
| Previous Message | Marko Kreen | 2009-02-18 17:00:17 | Re: [Plproxy-users] Two-phase commmit, plpgsql and plproxy |