Re: Hot standby, recovery infra

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hot standby, recovery infra
Date: 2009-02-18 16:21:27
Message-ID: 1234974087.3973.83.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 18:01 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 14:26 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> >
> >> The outer "if" should ensure that it isn't printed repeatedly on an idle
> >> system.
> >
> > Regrettably not.
>
> Ok, committed.

Cool.

> I fixed that and some comment changes. I also renamed
> IsRecoveryProcessingMode() to RecoveryInProgress(), to avoid confusion
> with the "real" processing modes defined in miscadmin.h. That will
> probably cause you merge conflicts in the hot standby patch, but it
> should be a matter of search-replace to fix.

Yep, good change, agree with reasons.

> The changes need to be documented. At least the removal of
> log_restartpoints is a clear user-visible change.

Yep.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2009-02-18 16:21:48 Re: pg_migrator progress
Previous Message Mohsen Alimomeni 2009-02-18 16:20:31 Multi calendar system for pgsql