| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Hot standby, recovery infra |
| Date: | 2009-02-05 09:34:34 |
| Message-ID: | 1233826474.4500.394.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 09:26 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> This change seems speculative and also against what has previously been
> agreed with Tom. If he chooses not to comment on your changes, that's up
> to him, but I don't think you should remove things quietly that have
> been put there through the community process, as if they caused
> problems. I feel like I'm in the middle here.
This is only a problem because of two independent reviewers.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-02-05 09:46:05 | Re: Hot standby, recovery infra |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-02-05 09:26:25 | Re: Hot standby, recovery infra |