From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Bugs during ProcessCatchupEvent() |
Date: | 2009-02-04 22:06:55 |
Message-ID: | 1233785215.4500.340.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 14:53 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 09:44 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > > > It looks to me that generating a single error message while idle causes
> > > > the server to provide ErrorResponse, which the client assumes is the end
> > > > of the processing of that statement as defined in FE/BE protocol.
> > >
> > > Yeah. I think this is actually a client-side issue: it should keep
> > > reading till it gets a 'Z' message. Not clear how that fits into the
> > > libpq-to-app API though.
> >
> > That makes sense. I'll dig around there.
> >
> >
> > The infinite loop error seems server-side though.
>
> Any progress on this?
No, not had time in recent days.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2009-02-04 22:22:44 | Re: <note> on hash indexes |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2009-02-04 21:56:11 | Re: Auto-updated fields |