| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Erik Jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>, volunteer(at)spatiallink(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: an other provokative question?? |
| Date: | 2007-09-07 05:51:35 |
| Message-ID: | 12333.1189144295@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Erik Jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com> writes:
> I'm curious, given that Postgres wasn't even an SQL-centric database
> when the original project ended, how much of the current Postgres
> code base still contains code from the original project before the
> incorporation of SQl rename to PostgreSQL?
You can still find a lot of code in the current CVS that has obvious
ancestry in Postgres v4r2. I think there might not be too many lines
that have never been changed at all, but nobody who could read C would
have any problem detecting the relationship.
Elein might have more to say on the point... I'm just a newbie.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zoltan Boszormenyi | 2007-09-07 06:29:24 | What's the difference between SET STORAGE MAIN and EXTENDED? |
| Previous Message | Ron Johnson | 2007-09-07 05:28:24 | Re: an other provokative question?? |