Re: Hot standby, recovery infra

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hot standby, recovery infra
Date: 2009-01-28 15:25:49
Message-ID: 1233156349.2327.2418.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 23:54 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> >> Why is InitXLOGAccess() called also here when bgwriter is started after
> >> recovery? That is already called by AuxiliaryProcessMain().
> >
> > InitXLOGAccess() sets the timeline and also gets the latest record
> > pointer. If the bgwriter is started in recovery these values need to be
> > reset later. It's easier to call it twice.
>
> Right. But, InitXLOGAccess() called during main loop is enough for
> that purpose.

I think the code is clearer the way it is. Otherwise you'd read
AuxiliaryProcessMain() and think the bgwriter didn't need xlog access.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message KaiGai Kohei 2009-01-28 15:31:35 Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2009-01-28 15:24:33 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Silence compiler warning on win32.