From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Hot standby, recovery infra |
Date: | 2009-01-28 15:25:49 |
Message-ID: | 1233156349.2327.2418.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 23:54 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> >> Why is InitXLOGAccess() called also here when bgwriter is started after
> >> recovery? That is already called by AuxiliaryProcessMain().
> >
> > InitXLOGAccess() sets the timeline and also gets the latest record
> > pointer. If the bgwriter is started in recovery these values need to be
> > reset later. It's easier to call it twice.
>
> Right. But, InitXLOGAccess() called during main loop is enough for
> that purpose.
I think the code is clearer the way it is. Otherwise you'd read
AuxiliaryProcessMain() and think the bgwriter didn't need xlog access.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2009-01-28 15:31:35 | Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2009-01-28 15:24:33 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Silence compiler warning on win32. |