Re: pg_upgrade project status

From: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade project status
Date: 2009-01-27 18:57:05
Message-ID: 1233082625.1475.17.camel@localhost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Magnus Hagander píše v út 27. 01. 2009 v 15:54 +0100:

>
> I have a hard time thinking that we'll have wasted a lot of time on
> first doing a perl implementation if we have to rewrite it in C later.
> The other way around would be a waste though. The amount of time spent
> on the perl implementation I expect to be a *lot* less than the
> combination of thinking up the *way* to do it in general and the C
> implementation time.

Agree with Magnus. I'm happy with korn shell for now :-). And we need
better solution anyway for future releases. Current approach does not
support e.g. dropped column.

Zdenek

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua Brindle 2009-01-27 18:57:26 Re: 8.4 release planning
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2009-01-27 18:54:09 Re: 8.4 release planning