Re: New 8.4 hot standby feature

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Gabi Julien <gabi(dot)julien(at)broadsign(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New 8.4 hot standby feature
Date: 2009-01-27 18:13:32
Message-ID: 1233080012.1243.22.camel@dell.linuxdev.us.dell.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 12:53 -0500, Gabi Julien wrote:
> I have merged the last hot standby patch (v9g) to 8.4 devel and I am pleased
> with the experience. This is promising stuff. Perhaps it is a bit too soon to
> ask questions here but here it is:
>
> 1. Speed of recovery
>
> With a archive_timeout of 60 seconds, it can take about 4 minutes before I see
> the reflected changes in the replica. This is normal since, in addition to
> the WAL log shipping, it takes more time to do the recovery itself. Still, is
> there any way besides the archive_timeout config option to speed up the
> recovery of WAL logs on the hot standby?
>

Is the recovery itself the bottleneck?

There's a performance improvement submitted here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/a778a7260810280033n43f70d36x8c437eacf9a5461e@mail.gmail.com

But I haven't been following the development of it closely, so you'll
have to read the thread to see whether it will meet your needs or not.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alban Hertroys 2009-01-27 18:22:32 Re: Re: how to implement a foreign key type constraint against a not unique column
Previous Message Sam Mason 2009-01-27 18:13:27 Re: FW: information about tables via psql