From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 8.4 release planning |
Date: | 2009-01-27 16:56:51 |
Message-ID: | 1233075411.2327.2233.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 11:36 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> > On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 03:12:02PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I don't think this is correct.
>
> > I do.
>
> > People literally grab my shoulder and ask when we'll have it.
>
> Do these people understand the difference between HS and a complete
> replication solution? Are they still as excited after you explain
> the difference?
Yes, I think they do.
http://www.postgresql.org/community/survey.55
These people seem to understand also.
Sync rep *is* important, but it opens up new classes of applications for
us. As does SEP. Both of those are more speculative and harder to
measure, but we've seen big impact before from this type of new feature.
HS appeals to current users. Current users aren't so worried about new
applications, they look forward to being able to run queries on their
currently idle standby servers.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2009-01-27 16:59:50 | Re: 8.4 release planning |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2009-01-27 16:51:17 | Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules) |