| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch |
| Date: | 2009-01-16 17:44:18 |
| Message-ID: | 1232127858.16299.23.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 12:40 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> >>> Again, "\dfS" would be a bit useless, unless we say that the implicit
> >>> U modifier for no pattern doesn't override an explicit S modifier.
> >>>
> >>> Comments? Does this cover all the cases?
> >>
> >> So would "\df" then be equivalent to "\dU"? Or am I misunderstanding
> >> something?
>
> > \df would act as it does now. Showing you *everything*.
>
> Which part of the quoted paragraph didn't you read?
Apparently at least part. Sorry for the noise.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> regards, tom lane
>
--
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake(at)jabber(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-01-16 17:47:00 | Re: GetCurrentVirtualXIDs() |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-01-16 17:41:59 | Re: [HACKERS] Question regarding new windowing functions in 8.4devel |