From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Recovery Test Framework |
Date: | 2009-01-12 21:06:54 |
Message-ID: | 1231794414.30598.181.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 16:02 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > However I can say I would be fairly annoyed if everytime I checked
> > hackers I was pulling down 5 megs in various patches.
>
> Oh... really? I thought we were past the day when anyone cared how
> large the attachments were.
IMO the fact that we email patches at all represents a broken system :P
but yes I care how big my attachments are. If -hackers was the only list
I was on, I wouldn't care but it obviously isn't.
Joshua D. Drake
--
PostgreSQL
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-01-12 21:07:28 | Re: Recovery Test Framework |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-01-12 21:02:36 | Re: Recovery Test Framework |