| From: | Darren Govoni <darren(at)ontrenet(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SELECT FOR UPDATE....LIMIT ...broken |
| Date: | 2009-01-11 17:30:10 |
| Message-ID: | 1231695010.1239.69.camel@nuraku |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Well, I did, but I clicked the link to Chapter 13 before scrolling down
further to see the Caution section. Heheh.
Thanks for the heads up.
On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 12:12 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Darren Govoni <darren(at)ontrenet(dot)com> writes:
> > This seems like a bug to me. Is it fixed in the current dev build? Or is
> > there something else I'm missing?
>
> I think you have not read the documentation about FOR UPDATE and LIMIT
> on the SELECT reference page:
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/sql-select.html#SQL-FOR-UPDATE-SHARE
> Note the second CAUTION block in particular.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2009-01-11 19:52:40 | PostgreSQL Conference / PgCon.US update |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-01-11 17:12:50 | Re: SELECT FOR UPDATE....LIMIT ...broken |