Re: QuickLZ compression algorithm (Re: Inclusion in the PostgreSQL backend for toasting rows)

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Douglas McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>, "Stephen R(dot) van den Berg" <srb(at)cuci(dot)nl>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, lar(at)quicklz(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: QuickLZ compression algorithm (Re: Inclusion in the PostgreSQL backend for toasting rows)
Date: 2009-01-05 21:02:16
Message-ID: 1231189336.26750.11.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 13:04 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > Are
> > we willing to be dropped from Debian and possibly Red Hat if this is
> > the case?

> Regardless of whether we do that or not, no one has offered any
> justification of the arbitrary decision not to compress columns >1MB,
> and at least one person (Peter) has suggested that it is exactly
> backwards. I think he's right, and this part should be backed out.
> That will leave us back in the sensible place where people who want
> compression can get it (which is currently false) and people who don't
> want it can get rid of it (which has always been true). If there is a
> demand for alternative compression algorithms, then someone can submit
> a patch for that for 8.5.
>
> ...Robert

+1

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
--
PostgreSQL
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lee McKeeman 2009-01-05 21:25:38 Re: Status of issue 4593
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2009-01-05 20:48:20 Re: Time to finalize patches for 8.4 beta