From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Filtering WAL records in recovery |
Date: | 2009-01-05 20:23:49 |
Message-ID: | 1231187029.26750.5.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 19:27 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> There's a long standing requirement for filtering WAL records during
> recovery, allowing us to select databases, tables etc.
>
> My approach to this has been to submit a patch for rmgr plugins.
>
> The patch has other good uses too, most especially being able to decode
> WAL records by having access to a continuously maintained catalog.
>
> That patch may not have been understood by many and a recent private
> conversation indicated it may be vetoed, though not really sure why.
>
> If we are going to reject the patch on rmgr plugins, then I'd like to
> get that overwith as quickly as possible so I can add other code to
> allow filtering for Hot Standby by some other route for 8.4.
Why are we adding features to patches?
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
> PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
>
>
--
PostgreSQL
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2009-01-05 20:35:02 | Re: an idea, language SPI |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-01-05 20:14:18 | Re: an idea, language SPI |