Re: 9.0 ?

From: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
To: "damien(at)dalibo(dot)info" <damien(at)dalibo(dot)info>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 9.0 ?
Date: 2009-01-02 13:39:08
Message-ID: 1230903548.32371.74.camel@laptop.gunduz.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 11:49 +0100, damien(at)dalibo(dot)info wrote:
>
>
> i don't know if it's the right time and the right place to launch this
> debate but i'd like to know what you guys think about having
> PostgreSQL
> 9.0 released in 2009 :)

Actually I was thinking the same, but I think we should use 9.0
*if/when* the hot standby and sync replication patches are committed.

Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ, RHCE
devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org

In response to

  • 9.0 ? at 2009-01-02 10:49:57 from damien@dalibo.info

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2009-01-02 14:38:26 Re: 9.0 ?
Previous Message damien@dalibo.info 2009-01-02 10:49:57 9.0 ?