| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Preventing index scans for non-recoverable index AMs |
| Date: | 2008-12-18 09:40:27 |
| Message-ID: | 1229593227.4793.355.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 08:29 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Right, this is certainly not a new problem. It's not even a new problem
> in the context of replication or hot standby, because we already have
> the problem with PITR and file-based log shipping.
>
> Also, it's not just a problem *during* the recovery. The index is just
> as corrupt after the recovery has finished.
Agreed.
> I think we should just leave it alone for 8.4, and fix it properly in a
> future relase by implementing WAL-logging for hash indexes.
You really think we should just leave it alone? That gives me less work,
so I will accept that if you think so. Gives me the shivers though.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-12-18 09:48:53 | Re: Variadic parameters vs parameter defaults |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-12-18 09:35:09 | Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code |