Re: Preventing index scans for non-recoverable index AMs

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Preventing index scans for non-recoverable index AMs
Date: 2008-12-18 02:21:51
Message-ID: 1229566911.4793.274.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 18:09 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:

> Are we really releasing an index type without recoverability for 8.4?
> Will this be in /contrib?

Worse than that, I'm talking about hash indexes (which are already here,
without WAL)

I would not contemplate a new index type without WAL.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-12-18 02:23:10 Re: Preventing index scans for non-recoverable index AMs
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2008-12-18 02:20:14 Re: Preventing index scans for non-recoverable index AMs