Re: Detection of hadware feature => please do not use signal

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Bastien Roucariès <rouca(at)debian(dot)org>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Detection of hadware feature => please do not use signal
Date: 2024-11-25 01:27:13
Message-ID: 1229505.1732498033@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> It does work on the "armv7" target BF animals, though. I assume they
> don't get any updates as they're all old/defunct distros (one of my
> favourite features of our boneyard^Wbuildfarm), but one of them is GCC
> "10.2.1 20210110", which is what made me suspicious of that -mfpu
> stuff, beyond my comprehension without a lot more coffee, that got
> backpatched in late 2021.

Ah, you're looking at mereswine, which is hard-float according to

checking build system type... armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf
checking host system type... armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf

I also confirmed that our existing code works on Fedora 30 armv7l
(also hard-float) with gcc 9.3.1. That's the only other ARM32
image I have at hand :-(

So yeah, it would seem they broke it between 10.2.1 and 10.5.0.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2024-11-25 03:42:51 Re: Today's Postgres Releases break login roles
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2024-11-25 00:47:06 Re: Detection of hadware feature => please do not use signal