Re: not exactly a bug report, but surprising behaviour

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: not exactly a bug report, but surprising behaviour
Date: 2003-02-06 14:56:21
Message-ID: 12294.1044543381@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> Well, yes but I wasn't sure what to look for. It sort of looks to me like
> gprof chose an odd place to root the recursive cycle which makes the result
> confusing. At least to me.

_SPI_execute_plan? I thought you said this was a simple SELECT...ORDER BY
query.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message jerome 2003-02-06 15:01:54 Re: Backup scheme...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-02-06 14:52:25 Re: Pg_dumpall problem