| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com |
| Cc: | "Rutherdale, Will" <Rutherw(at)cisco(dot)com>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Data Replication |
| Date: | 2008-12-11 19:33:10 |
| Message-ID: | 1229023990.13078.96.camel@hp_dx2400_1 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 11:29 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > As I said before, if you think something is missing, submit a software
> > or a doc patch and submit it to peer review. Until then, I think its
> > misleading to claim that only your magic spice makes replication work
> > correctly and to make out everybody else had to go through huge pains to
> > get it to work. Cos I get emails all the time saying how easy it was to
> > configure and easy to administrate.
>
> I didn't say only my magic does that. What I said was purely factual.
> That PostgreSQL by itself doesn't provide everything you need to get log
> shipping working and my *ONLY* point was that we should be clear when
> people ask, that they will have to roll their own to a degree.
Software or doc patch, please, if you want them to be really clear.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-12-11 19:46:10 | Re: Data Replication |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-12-11 19:29:20 | Re: Data Replication |