From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1268) |
Date: | 2008-12-08 19:00:52 |
Message-ID: | 1228762852.20796.671.camel@hp_dx2400_1 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 03:33 +0900, KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> writes:
> >> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >>> I assume that could just be always enabled.
> >
> >> It is not "always" enabled. When we build it with SE-PostgreSQL feature,
> >> rest of enhanced security features (includes the row-level ACL) are
> >> disabled automatically, as we discussed before.
> >
> > It seems like a pretty awful idea to have enabling sepostgres take away
> > a feature that exists in the default build.
>
> Why?
>
> The PGACE security framework allows one or no enhanced security
> mechanism at most. It is quite natural that the default selection
> is overrided when an alternative option is chosen explicitly.
I'm finding these discussions very confusing to follow, sorry about
that.
We now have a parameter option that allows you to have row level
security in non-mandatory mode, which is good. But in order to get that
we need to build the server with a special configure option.
My previous objective was to remove the need for a configure option, so
we can enable row-level security in the default distribution of
Postgres. Are we going to enable that option in all normal distros? If
yes, why is it a configure option (at all)?
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Emmanuel Cecchet | 2008-12-08 19:47:12 | Re: Transactions and temp tables |
Previous Message | David Rowley | 2008-12-08 18:50:35 | Re: Quick patch: Display sequence owner |