From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Why do we define HAVE_GSSAPI_EXT_H? |
Date: | 2024-07-08 23:05:32 |
Message-ID: | 1228648.1720479932@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> configure/meson define HAVE_GSSAPI_EXT_H / HAVE_GSSAPI_GSSAPI_EXT_H - but
> afaict we don't use those anywhere?
It looks to me like it's just a byproduct of the autoconf macros
we use to verify that you have a sane installation:
if test "$with_gssapi" = yes ; then
AC_CHECK_HEADERS(gssapi/gssapi.h, [],
[AC_CHECK_HEADERS(gssapi.h, [], [AC_MSG_ERROR([gssapi.h header file is required for GSSAPI])])])
AC_CHECK_HEADERS(gssapi/gssapi_ext.h, [],
[AC_CHECK_HEADERS(gssapi_ext.h, [], [AC_MSG_ERROR([gssapi_ext.h header file is required for GSSAPI])])])
fi
There might be a variant of AC_CHECK_HEADERS that doesn't have
the default define-a-symbol action, not sure.
Maybe it's not really necessary to check both gssapi.h and
gssapi_ext.h, but I'm not very familiar with all the variants of
GSSAPI that are out there.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2024-07-08 23:39:21 | Re: Faster "SET search_path" |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2024-07-08 22:57:12 | Re: 010_pg_basebackup.pl vs multiple filesystems |