From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Who is moderating the news? |
Date: | 2008-11-24 19:50:19 |
Message-ID: | 1227556219.24620.59.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 19:46 +0000, Dave Page wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 18:24 +0000, Dave Page wrote:
> >> Can whoever is supposed to be moderating the news please do so?
> >> apparently there is at least one item stuck in the queue again.
> >>
> >> Also, what do we need to do to prevent the moderation emails being lost/ignored?
> >>
> >
> > Don't send them to the slaves list. That list gets hammered with so much
> > noise it is easy to mentally turn it off. I know that sometimes I forget
> > to check events because I open the folder and I have hundreds of
> > automirror reports, mirror test reports, autobackup reports etc...
>
> Well that is what the slaves list is for. It's pretty easy for the
> moderators to filter out the stuff from nagios etc - is it really
> worth a separate list?
*shrug*. I am a big fan of contextual lists. If the list is for
reporting then it should be a reporting list. If it is for doing stuff
it should be for doing stuff. If you mix the two you get noise.
I guess I could hyper filter but generally I just filter based on
address not subject or content.
Joshua D. Drake
>
>
--
PostgreSQL
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-11-24 19:56:50 | Re: Who is moderating the news? |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2008-11-24 19:46:34 | Re: Who is moderating the news? |