| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: TABLE command |
| Date: | 2008-11-18 16:01:18 |
| Message-ID: | 1227024078.28242.27.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 10:36 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 04:01:58PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> I was looking into that and I figured using the \G expression in
> >> Perl REs would be useful for this (to find multiple <refname>s).
> >> But this was introduced in Perl 5.000, and we claim to support Perl
> >> 4 in create_help.pl. I recall that you Tom once arranged this to
> >> support building on some old machines. Is this still relevant?
>
> > No.
>
> I concur, there isn't likely to be much demand for building PG >= 8.4
> with Perl 4.
+1
Joshua D. Drake
>
> regards, tom lane
>
--
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sam Mason | 2008-11-18 16:01:59 | Re: is any reason why only one columns subselect are allowed in array()? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-11-18 15:44:48 | Re: Re: toast by chunk-end (was Re: PG_PAGE_LAYOUT_VERSION 5 - time for change) |