| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: xmlconcat as variadic function |
| Date: | 2008-11-18 00:37:48 |
| Message-ID: | 1226968668.3973.54.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 19:34 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Well, for example pg_catalog.xmlconcat(...) will behave differently if
> >> we make this change.
>
> > Uh, because there is no pg_catalog.xmlconcat() in 8.3. Why is that
> > relevant?
>
> My point is it's a user-visible change --- maybe a subtle one, but still
> a change that in principle could break some app somewhere --- and no
> good reason has been put forward for making it.
Uhh... what user is going to be calling pg_catalog.xmlconcat() in any
version? Wouldn't it be public.xml... or other namespace?
Joshua D. Drake
>
> regards, tom lane
>
--
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-11-18 00:48:07 | Re: xmlconcat as variadic function |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-11-18 00:34:49 | Re: xmlconcat as variadic function |