| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard |
| Date: | 2008-11-13 23:53:37 |
| Message-ID: | 1226620417.7149.2.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 18:07 -0500, Greg Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Since Josh's latest parameter model takes a database size as an input,
> perhaps a reasonable way to proceed here is to put the DW model into size
> tiers. Something like this:
>
> DW default_statistics_target:
>
> db size setting
> <1GB 10
> 1GB-10GB 50
> 10GB-100GB 100
> 100GB-1TB 200
> >1TB 400
>
> Going along with my idea that this tool should produce a reasonable result
> with minimal data, I was thinking of making the database size default to
> 10GB if there isn't any input given there. That would give someone who
> specified DW but nothing else a result of 100, which seems a less
> controversial setting.
>
Why are we building wizards for settings that will be configured by
experts? I thought the idea here was:
Simple postgresql.conf wizard
If you are running a DW you are beyond the point of this tool are you
not?
Joshua D. Drake
> --
> * Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
>
--
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-11-13 23:56:57 | Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard |
| Previous Message | Benedek László | 2008-11-13 23:31:04 | Re: pg_dump roles support |