| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Gianni Ciolli <gianni(dot)ciolli(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it> |
| Subject: | Re: Bitmap Indexes patch (was Re: Bitmap Indexes: request for feedback) |
| Date: | 2008-11-04 00:12:29 |
| Message-ID: | 1225757549.3971.1041.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 16:53 -0700, Vladimir Sitnikov wrote:
> The major thing there is to get the modifications right. There is no
> much sense in reviewing "wrong" code against "locking issues".
I didn't say there were no other bugs, nor would I know, only that I had
reviewed the locking issues specifically because of the possible effects
on Hot Standby. I haven't seen any problems that would be caused by
locking. In general, all aspects of code needs to be checked, especially
if there are bugs, else how would you resolve them?
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vladimir Sitnikov | 2008-11-04 00:18:47 | Re: Bitmap Indexes patch (was Re: Bitmap Indexes: request for feedback) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-11-04 00:10:01 | Re: gram.y => preproc.y |