From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard |
Date: | 2008-11-03 09:06:49 |
Message-ID: | 1225703209.8122.26.camel@huvostro |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 17:10 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Greg Smith wrote:
>
> -Stepping back a bit from this particular code, is something in Python
> like this ever going to be appropriate to ship as a contrib module?
I think python should be as good as any relatively widespread language.
Unless we require all contrib to be in C.
> There seems to be a bit more traction in this community for using Perl
> for such things; I might do a Perl port of this one day but that's not
> going to happen soon.
The advantage of python over perl is that anybody who knows at least one
programming language is able to learn basic python in an afternoon.
> If you do a python version, others will write versions in other
> languages.
Yeah, if python is not accepted as contrib, then it can probably be
rewritten in C once it has stabilized enough.
> I personally don't really care; Perl's main advantage is
> that it's pre-installed on more OSes than Python is.
I think most (if not all) modern OS's standard setup includes both perl
and python. Except of course windows which probably includes neither.
------------------------------------------
Hannu Krosing http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Scalability and Availability
Services, Consulting and Training
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2008-11-03 09:12:47 | Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard |
Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2008-11-03 08:55:03 | Re: WIP patch: convert SQL-language functions to return tuplestores |