From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "PostgreSQL-dev(dot)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: typcategory for regconfig |
Date: | 2018-04-05 14:04:46 |
Message-ID: | 12255.1522937086@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On 5 April 2018 at 15:48, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Right. So you need to either drop that form, or consider doing
>> something other than add-a-bool. Maybe the alternate behavior
>> should have a different function name, instead of being selected
>> by an argument?
> Yep, I'll swallow my perfectionism and go with a new function.
There's plenty of nearby precedent for that, eg plainto_tsquery and
phraseto_tsquery, so I'm not even sure this is a less attractive option.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2018-04-05 14:07:57 | Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. |
Previous Message | Erik Rijkers | 2018-04-05 14:02:35 | Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. |