From: | John DeSoi <desoi(at)pgedit(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Raimon Fernandez <coder(at)montx(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Extended Query, flush or sync ? |
Date: | 2009-12-19 15:32:02 |
Message-ID: | 1224664A-9C2B-4CE2-888C-7F50F7556BBD@pgedit.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-interfaces |
On Dec 19, 2009, at 2:40 AM, Raimon Fernandez wrote:
>> I send:
>>
>> parse
>> bind
>> describe
>> execute
>> sync
>>
>> and then loop on the connection stream to receive the responses.
>
> And do you get the parseComplete after sending the parse or after sending the sync ?
I don't really know or care. I send the entire sequence above and then read the results handling each possible case. In other words, I don't read anything after each message; I only read after sending the sync.
> And also from the docs:
>
> "If Execute terminates before completing the execution of a portal (due to reaching a nonzero result- row count), it will send a PortalSuspended message; t
> he appearance of this message tells the frontend that another Execute should be issued against the same portal to complete the operation. "
>
> If I execute with a row limit of 1000, and I know there are more than 1000 rows, I get the portalSuspended as described.
>
> But, If a issue a new Execute, postgresql says that myPortal doesn't exist anymore.
>
> How I can get those 1000 rows ?
Are you using a named portal? Are you reading all responses until you receive a ready for query response? There are a lot of details - it really helped me to look at the psql source.
John DeSoi, Ph.D.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2009-12-19 15:34:13 | Re: AccessShareLock question |
Previous Message | Chris Ernst | 2009-12-19 15:20:33 | Re: Extracting SQL from logs in a usable format |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Raimon Fernandez | 2009-12-20 19:11:49 | Re: Extended Query, flush or sync ? |
Previous Message | Raimon Fernandez | 2009-12-19 07:40:12 | Re: Extended Query, flush or sync ? |