| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SlruPhysicalReadPage |
| Date: | 2008-10-15 23:26:01 |
| Message-ID: | 1224113161.3808.253.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 15:13 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > This seems inconsistent. Why is the first page OK to be created, but any
> > other pages after that cause failure? ISTM the first page is nothing
> > special.
>
> It's special on the writing side, I'm not sure why the reading side
> wouldn't treat it specially too.
I've added code for seek and read also, not just open.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ian Caulfield | 2008-10-15 23:33:28 | array_agg (was Re: The Axe list) |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-10-15 22:58:19 | Re: Is autovacuum too noisy about orphan temp tables? |