| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Galbavy <peter(dot)galbavy(at)knowtion(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: LGPL |
| Date: | 2005-06-18 13:26:50 |
| Message-ID: | 12236.1119101210@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Galbavy <peter(dot)galbavy(at)knowtion(dot)net> writes:
> So, is there an effort to not require GNU make then ?
No, that's not relevant. GNU make is a tool, not part of the end
result.
A more interesting question is Autoconf, which we also depend on
as a build tool, and which does copy parts of itself into the
distributed product. However, Autoconf explicitly releases its
output scripts as entirely free software, not GPL code.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2005-06-18 13:27:49 | Re: default database creation with initdb |
| Previous Message | John Hansen | 2005-06-18 12:03:38 | Re: Returning Composite Types from C functions |