Re: itemptr_encode/itemptr_decode

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: itemptr_encode/itemptr_decode
Date: 2019-04-17 23:22:08
Message-ID: 1223.1555543328@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2019-04-17 18:57:00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> What on God's green earth are these functions doing in
>> src/include/catalog/index.h?

> I'm happy to move them elsewhere, but I'm not sure there's really a good
> location. I guess we could move them to itemptr.h - but they're not
> really something particularly generally usable.

I don't have a better idea than that either, but I sure feel that they
don't belong in index.h. Is it worth inventing a whole new header
for these? If we stick 'em in itemptr.h, they'll be getting compiled
by a whole lot of files :-(

As for the general usability argument, I'm not sure --- as we start
to look at alternate AMs, we might have more use for them. When I first
saw the functions, I thought maybe they were part of sort acceleration
for TIDs; evidently they're not (yet), but that seems like another
possible use-case.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2019-04-17 23:39:16 Re: Race conditions with checkpointer and shutdown
Previous Message Andres Freund 2019-04-17 23:14:42 Re: itemptr_encode/itemptr_decode