Re: Transaction Snapshots and Hot Standby

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Transaction Snapshots and Hot Standby
Date: 2008-09-15 13:49:59
Message-ID: 1221486599.3913.1368.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 16:26 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> In any case, we'll need the capability in the slave to notice when
> it's about to remove a tuple that's still visible to a snapshot in the
> slave.

Agreed.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-09-15 13:52:50 Re: Transaction Snapshots and Hot Standby
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2008-09-15 13:46:45 Re: Parsing of pg_hba.conf and authentication inconsistencies