From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)krosing(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>, ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication |
Date: | 2008-09-10 09:04:39 |
Message-ID: | 1221037479.3913.630.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 17:57 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> I cannot accept that WAL sender is blocked for initial setup.
Yes, very important point. We definitely agree on that. The primary must
be able to continue working while all this setup is happening. No tables
are locked, all commits are allowed etc..
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2008-09-10 09:07:49 | Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication |
Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2008-09-10 08:57:33 | Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication |