From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: For what should pg_stop_backup wait? |
Date: | 2008-09-08 16:16:31 |
Message-ID: | 1220890591.3913.190.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 11:57 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> >> So thinking we should test XLogArchiveCheckDone() for both
> >> stopxlogfilename and history file and then stat for the stop WAL file:
>
> > This seems better.
>
> Somehow I missed the 5-Apr patch that introduced this bogosity.
> Next time you make a fundamental change in the behavior of a function,
> how about updating its comment to match?
It felt OK when I did it, because of the clearly named boolean. But I
accept your point and will look to improve my code comments in future.
> After studying it for a minute, I think that XLogArchiveCheckDone no
> longer even has a clearly explainable purpose; it needs to be split
> into two functions with two different behaviors. I plan to revert
> XLogArchiveCheckDone to its previous behavior and introduce
> XLogArchiveIsBusy (flipping the sense of the result) to use in
> pg_stop_backup.
You sound like you're in the middle of doing this yourself. Or would you
like me to do that?
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2008-09-08 16:33:26 | Re: Fast REVERSE() function? |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-09-08 16:10:25 | Re: Fast REVERSE() function? |