| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Postgres <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal |
| Date: | 2008-09-08 11:11:31 |
| Message-ID: | 1220872291.3913.124.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 13:52 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > I think there needs to be an option to force this to do either sorts or
> > indexscans.
>
> If we use the planner, "set enable_indexscan =off" or "set
> enable_sort=off" ought to work.
Agreed - as long as that is explicitly in the docs.
I'm wondering whether we should put a limit on size of each temp
tablespace. This change will cause old admin jobs to break disks that
aren't big enough for the new way of doing it.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | ITAGAKI Takahiro | 2008-09-08 11:15:00 | Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-09-08 11:08:26 | Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code |