Re: pg_restore and the use of encryption

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: cjwhite(at)cisco(dot)com, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_restore and the use of encryption
Date: 2003-02-02 17:39:00
Message-ID: 12205.1044207540@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> This seems very strange. Are you sure those binaries are all from the
> same release.

I don't think they could be. Our build procedure computes just one LIBS
list and uses it for all executables, so in ordinary circumstances all
the executables will have the same set of shared-library dependencies.
Certainiy pg_dump and pg_restore will, if they were built at the same
time.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-02-02 17:46:34 Re: Vacuum full hang
Previous Message Tilo Schwarz 2003-02-02 14:47:30 Re: Postgres server output log