From: | Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Rocco Altier <RoccoA(at)Routescape(dot)com>, Nigel Kukard <nkukard(at)lbsd(dot)net>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: IPv6 patch |
Date: | 2003-01-07 17:27:19 |
Message-ID: | 121960000.1041960439@lerlaptop.iadfw.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
--On Tuesday, January 07, 2003 12:24:41 -0500 Bruce Momjian
<pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Larry Rosenman wrote:
>>
>>
>> --On Tuesday, January 07, 2003 12:20:31 -0500 Tom Lane
>> <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>
>> > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> >> We already do. The issue is what way should we give admins to _fail_
>> >> if IPv6 doesn't start.
>> >
>> > What is "IPv6 doesn't start"? Either the machine has IPv6 addresses,
>> > or it doesn't. It is not our job to notify the DBA what the addresses
>> > on his machine are.
>> In the UnixWare case, you can't even find out if there is an IPv6
>> address, and
>> the API returns a wierd error, IIRC.
>
> I don't think we care about how IPv6 fails in our code --- we just fall
> back to IPv4.
Ok, just checking. IIRC, apache2 refused to start BECAUSE of the this
return
prior to Jeff Trawick's change of the check.
If someone wants to try it, I can generate an account. (Peter E. already
has one).
the machine is finally running a released OS again :-).
LER
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-01-07 17:33:33 | Re: SQL_SIZING view |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-01-07 17:24:41 | Re: IPv6 patch |