| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Regina Obe" <lr(at)pcorp(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "'Sandro Santilli'" <strk(at)kbt(dot)io>, "'Gregory Stark \(as CFM\)'" <stark(dot)cfm(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Ability to reference other extensions by schema in extension scripts |
| Date: | 2023-03-21 14:52:11 |
| Message-ID: | 1219580.1679410331@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Regina Obe" <lr(at)pcorp(dot)us> writes:
>> making the no_relocate values visible somehow, I'm not convinced that
>> pg_available_extension_versions should be the place to do it. ISTM what's
>> relevant is the no_relocate values of *installed* extensions, not those of
>> potentially-installable extensions. If we had a view over pg_extension then
>> that might be a place to add this, but we don't. On the whole it didn't seem
>> important enough to pursue, so I just left it out.
> Thanks. Agree with get_available_versions_for_extension, not necessary.
If we did feel like doing something about this, on reflection I think
the thing to do would be to add no_relocate as an actual column in
pg_extension, probably of type "oid[]". Then we could modify the
SET SCHEMA code to check that instead of parsing the extension control
files. That'd be a little cleaner, but I can't say that I'm hugely
excited about it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2023-03-21 14:57:18 | Re: Request for comment on setting binary format output per session |
| Previous Message | Regina Obe | 2023-03-21 14:29:44 | RE: Ability to reference other extensions by schema in extension scripts |